Shilaneh Food IndustriesMore than a ton
Shilaneh Food IndustriesMore than a ton
Login or Register
May 18, 2025
XTelegramFacebookWhatsappLinkedinPinterest

Nutritional Comparison: Canned Tuna vs. Fresh Fish - What's the Difference?

Canned Tuna vs. Fresh Fish: Which Is Healthier? Comparing Protein, Omega-3s, Mercury, and More

Summary:Both canned tuna and fresh fish are nutritious, but they have key differences. Canned tuna is higher in protein and selenium, while fresh fish (especially fatty types like salmon) typically contains more omega-3s and vitamins D and B12. Canned tuna is convenient and shelf-stable but often has added sodium and may contain more mercury (especially albacore). Fresh fish is lower in sodium and mercury (depending on the species) but must be eaten quickly. For a budget-friendly, long-lasting option, canned tuna is practical, but for maximum omega-3s and freshness, opt for fresh fish when possible. Choose based on your health needs, convenience, and taste preferences.
there are three tins of tuna and tuna on a plate
25 views
No comments
about one minute

When it comes to seafood, both canned tuna and fresh fish are popular choices. But how do they compare nutritionally? Does one offer more health benefits than the other? Let’s break down the key differences to help you make an informed choice. 

1. Protein Content 

Both canned tuna and fresh fish are excellent sources of high-quality protein. A 3-ounce (85g) serving of canned tuna provides about 20-22 grams of protein, while the same amount of fresh fish (like salmon or cod) offers 17-22 grams, depending on the type. 

2. Omega-3 Fatty Acids 

Fresh fish, especially fatty varieties like salmon, mackerel, and sardines, tend to have higher omega-3 fatty acids compared to canned tuna. However, canned tuna (particularly albacore) still provides a good amount of these heart-healthy fats.

 3. Sodium Levels 

One downside of canned tuna is its higher sodium content due to added salt for preservation. Fresh fish contains little to no added sodium, making it a better choice for those watching their salt intake. 

4. Mercury Content 

Canned tuna, especially albacore (white tuna), can have higher mercury levels than smaller fresh fish like salmon or sardines. Light tuna (skipjack) is generally lower in mercury and safer for frequent consumption.

 5. Convenience & Shelf Life 

Canned tuna wins in terms of convenience and long shelf life, making it a pantry staple. Fresh fish requires refrigeration and should be consumed within a few days. 

6. Vitamins & Minerals 

Fresh fish often contains more vitamins D and B12, while canned tuna provides more selenium due to the canning process. Both are rich in essential nutrients like iron, potassium, and magnesium. 

Summary: 

Protein: Similar in both, but canned tuna is slightly higher. 

Omega-3s: Fresh fish (especially fatty types) usually has more. 

Sodium: Canned tuna has more; fresh fish is naturally low.

Mercury: Canned albacore has more; light tuna is safer. 

Convenience: Canned tuna lasts longer; fresh fish is perishable.

 Vitamins & Minerals: Fresh fish has more vitamin D & B12; canned tuna has more selenium. 

 

Shilaneh Editorial Team

The Shilaneh Editorial Team consists of experienced writers and specialists in related fields. With the goal of producing high-quality and comprehensive content, we examine and analyze relevant topics. We always strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information for our valued readers with great care and attention to detail. The primary objective of this team is to enhance awareness and deliver useful, valuable content for all audiences.